Sometimes a whistleblower may not feel able to raise their concerns with their employer, they may fear being ignored or victimised, or they may have already raised concerns which have not been dealt with. Whistleblowing doesn’t work unless concerned workers can approach organisations outside of their employers. Regulators have a vital role in this framework in holding public and private sector bodies to account and ensuring best practice in the areas for which they are responsible. Prescribed persons are regulators or professional bodies who are prescribed by the Government to hear concerns and who are deemed responsible for certain sectors/industries and/or issues.
This website provides an overview for our Annual Whistleblowing Reports: A Best Practice Guide.
Not all regulators or professional bodies are prescribed, we encourage all to apply to be prescribed via BEIS. Here is a summary of arguments for why regulators and professional bodies should apply for this legal status:
What are the advantages of being a Prescribed Person?
What are the advantages for whistleblowers approaching Prescribed Persons?
What are the duties of a Prescribed Person?
In a bid to make prescribed persons more transparent when dealing with whistleblowers and their concerns, in 2017 the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) introduced a reporting duty on the UK’s statutory regulators. This duty makes it compulsory to publish an annual report in relation to the number of whistleblowing disclosures they have received, action they have taken as a result and how this has impacted their own regulatory work. Those exempt from the reporting requirement are auditors appointed to audit the accounts of small authorities, MPs and Ministers of the Crown.
The reporting period runs 1 April to 31 March with the reporting period beginning 1 April 2017. The report can be a standalone report or incorporated within an annual report. The report must be published on the Prescribed Person’s website within 6 months of the end of the reporting period, or “in such other manner as the body considers appropriate for bringing the report to the attention of the public”.
What are Prescribed Persons under a duty to provide in the report?
What is not included in the duties?
DOs for effective Prescribed Person reporting:
Other resources:
Collation of Prescribed Persons Whistleblowing Reports:
Conclusions from 4 years' of data
Read our blog from legal adviser, Phoebe Mather, looking at 4 years’ worth of prescribed person data and the conclusions we can (and cannot) draw from this.